Just when we thought it was safe...
....Trust me, I'm a financial planner
What a surprise to see the country's largest financial Services Company getting
a ping from ASIC. ASIC has found that AMP Financial Services, or AMPFP, may have
given faulty and inappropriate advice to some 7,000 clients who collectively
invested around $100 million. There are allegations of pushing their own
products. AMP has now an enforceable undertaking with ASIC and will review its
procedures. ASIC's action against AMP FP will have a ripple effect throughout
the whole financial services industry but I suspect there will be little change.
The industry still disgraces itself at every turn. What a surprise that the
biggest financial advisers in the country are pushing their own products. Gee,
how could that happen, sell their own products? AMP Financial Services have 10
industry superannuation funds on its product list, but let's look at the numbers
with more clarity. Between January and October 2005 93% of clients' money at AMP
was channelled into AMP products, which ASIC noted was not unusual for large
dealer groups. Now understand that 85% of financial planners are owned by the
large institutions, which means that under the guise of independent advice most
are simply pushing their own products. But we knew this, didn't we?
Readers of this newsletter will be aware of my views of the large institutions
and their objectivity. Craig Dunn, Managing Director of AMP Financial Services,
likened AMP FP to a restaurant and said that if people didn't like the menu they
shouldn't enter. Who are you kidding Craig, no that's not right! When you
purport to serve Italian, Asian, French and all the other food of the globe you
don't expect all your customers to end up with a meat pie. And by the way, what
does that make AMP advisers? Waiters?
AMP now has to review those 7,000 clients to see if the meat pie was appropriate
for their tastes. Fortunately when you go to a restaurant the bad decisions you
may make only last around 24-hours, unlike financial advice which can have a
lasting impact for many years. ASIC's review of AMP FP suggests that less than
55% of those 7,000 clients received appropriate and properly documented
information. Well, 1 in 2 got it right. I can't imagine many other industries
that would survive with a 50% "getting-it-right track record". I'm certainly
glad that AMP is not running Airlines or Hospital operating theatres.
Who would blame the advisers because by recommending their own products they
obviously get far more Money disguised of course as "bonus dollars", "bonus
points", "commission points", "commission credits", or "salary credits". It all
equates to more money for recommending their own products.
I did notice in a recent article in a popular Australian share magazine recently
which rated some of the top 30 performing fund managers in Australia combined
with low fees. Guess what - AMP didn't have one of their funds in this list. I
don't think it's a matter of how appropriate the advice, more to the point it's
how inappropriate most of the advice is from the large institutions. As long as
this culture pervades the financial planning industry, objective advice is still
hard to find. I don't think any of us are actually still fooled into thinking
the institutions actually care about us (as some of the advertising would have
us believe) This "We take care of you" or "look after you" or "nurture your
growth" is exactly what we know it to be... SPIN. The large institutions are
interested in profits and their share price. So it may be appropriate to invest
in their shares, but please.... don't let's get our financial advice from them.
Residential Investment Property or Listed Property Trusts?
Australian investors do have a love affair with property as an investment. For
the most part, however, investors have focused on residential property but is
the buying an investment property a sensible way to invest. What about listed
property trusts?
What are listed property trusts?
A listed property trust (LPT) is a collective investment vehicle that owns a
portfolio of real property. Listed property trusts are quoted on the Australian
Stock Exchange (ASX), which allows investors to purchase an interest in a
professionally managed portfolio or commercial real estate. Property trust
managers invest in properties across a diversity of geographic regions, with
varying lease lengths and tenant types. As at December 2004, there were more
than 65 LPTs listed on the ASX, with a combined market capitalisation of over
$74 billion. There are now a few less with recent consolidation
Advantages of listed property trusts
While history has shown that property has proven to be a good investment,
residential property is only one way to access the property sector. LPTs can
give you the peace of mind of knowing your money is invested in bricks and
mortar, but at the same time offer additional advantages.
The following looks at eight advantages of LPTs over traditional residential
property investments:
1. Diversification: We all know the phrase 'don't put all your eggs in one
basket.' Well, the same principle applies to property investment. There is a
significantly higher chance of an isolated event pressuring the value of
residential investment property compared with an investment in LPTs where the
risk is spread across a number of properties. LPTs generally invest across a
number of different property sectors, such as office, retail and hotels - not
just residential property. Given that these sectors do not perform in unison,
this results in further diversification. Some LPTs also have exposure to
international property, providing yet another level of diversification. There is
not much diversification buying that 1 property in one street in one suburb in
one town in one country.
2. Liquidity: Perhaps in the future you may need to sell your investment. While
selling a residential property can take some time - finding an agent;
advertising; negotiating the sale and settlement - the sale process with LPTs is
significantly faster. LPTs are listed on the ASX, so selling an investment is as
easy as placing an order with a stockbroker. Furthermore, instead of selling
your entire investment, you can choose how much you liquidate. In comparison,
with a residential investment property you need to sell the entire holding.
3. Access to new opportunities: LPTs provide investors with investment access to
sectors of the property market once reserved only for the extremely wealthy.
With the combined spending power of investors, LPTs invest in hotels, office
towers and shopping centres. The price of these properties is generally well
beyond the scope of the average investor.
4. Expertise: LPTs are managed by property professionals. They are skilled at
determining which properties offer the most value, in terms of capital growth
and income, negotiating on price, development, tenanting and ongoing
maintenance. Whilst the key to investing in property is buying well, further
value can be added through successful management.
5. Higher yields: the average rental yield for a three-bedroom house in Sydney
over the 12 months to December 2005 was 2.6% (and that's before any expenses
were taken out such as agents fees repairs and maintenance). This compares with
yields from LPTs that averaged over 4.5% over the same period (after fees).
6. No need to borrow: With the average Australian house price close to $507,500,
investing in residential property demands a significant capital investment and
in most cases a large amount of debt. In comparison, the minimum capital
investment required to gain exposure to the property market through LPTs is
generally around $1,000. However you can still borrow around the same amount to
invest as if you were buying your own investment property.
7. No surprise bills: With LPTs there is no additional expenditure required
other than the initial investment. Water rates, council rates, strata feeds,
one-off special levies and property management fees are just a few of the bills
that you might expect with a residential property.
8. No stamp duties: When you buy a property, you incur a stamp duty that may run
into several thousand dollars, depending on the sale price. In contrast, there
is no stamp duty on buying shares in LPTs. To give you an estimate, the stamp
duty on a $507,000 investment property in NSW is currently more than $18,000.
How to invest in listed property trusts
There are over 60 LPTs currently listed on the ASX. Each has a portfolio of
properties and often operates in different sectors of the market including
retail, hotels, office, industrial (factories) and residential (through housing
projects). Many of these LPTs also have property holdings in countries other
than Australia.
Like investing in actively managed equity funds, property security managers
attempt to provide higher returns than the market, adjusted for risk and fees
charged.
If you do have an obsession with property, you should at least try and get the
best return?